A recent incident at the Mall of America has brought attention to the delicate balance between freedom of speech and private property rights.
Paul School, a mall patron, was asked to leave the mall wearing a shirt that read “Jesus Saves” by mall security.
The school refused to leave, stating that his shirt was protected under the First Amendment.
The mall, however, argued that as a privately owned property, they have the right to set rules and regulations on what is allowed on the property.
They stated that the shirt was not in line with their dress code, prohibiting clothing with offensive or controversial messages.
The incident raises the question of where the line is drawn regarding free speech in privately owned spaces.
The First Amendment to the U.s. guarantees the right to free expression, but it only applies to government restrictions.
Private Property Owners
Private property owners have the right to set their own rules and regulations.
The Mall of America’s dress code policy is not unique, and many shopping centers and private businesses have similar policies.
These policies are implemented to maintain a certain level of decorum and maintain patrons’ peace.
In the case of Schorr, the mall offered him the option to change his shirt or turn it inside out. He refused, and the mall security asked him to leave the property.
The school has stated that he plans to take legal action against the mall, claiming his rights were violated.
This incident highlights the ongoing debate over the limits of free speech and the rights of private property owners.
It serves as a reminder that the right to free speech is not absolute, and the laws surrounding it can be complex and nuanced.
It also highlights the importance of understanding and respecting the rules and regulations of private properties.
